Medical& Legal data is for informational purposes only. You should always consult your family physician, or one of our referral physicians prior
1
®
Biofeedback is a practical approach to diseases.
Edited By Dr. Héctor E. Solórzano, M.D., D.Sc.
Professor of Pharmacology and President of
Biofeedback Society of Guadalajara.
Since the publication of the results of a
study done by Dr. Eisenberg, in The New England
Journal of Medicine on January 28
th
1993, the in-
terest on alternative medicine has increased enor-
mously. He found that Americans spent $17 bil-
lion dollars in medical visits to alternative medi-
cine practitioners. These patients preferred to spend
their money than to receive the free medical or-
thodox consultation.
In 1992, the Office of Alternative Medi-
cine was opened as part of the NIH with a budget
of $2 million dollars. The increase of the demand
to know more about these therapies has been so
large that in October 21
st
, 1998 this OAM turned
into the National Center for Complementary and
Alternative Medicine whose functions are to fa-
cilitate and drive biomedical research with a bud-
get of $20 million dollars during that year.
Currently there are about 12 centers of the
NCCAM that do research on alternative medicine
in areas of specific diseases.
Then in 1994, the May issue of Pediatrics
published for the first time in the history of the
American conventional medicine a clinical study-
using homeopathy. Researchers of the University
of Washington and Universidad de Guadalajara did
it (Jacobs J., Jiménez LM, et al: “Treatment of acute
childhood diarrhea with homeopathic medicine: A
randomized clinical trial in Nicaragua,” Pediatrics
93: 719-25, 1994).
The trends in alternative medicine use in
the United States were reviewed and again Dr.
Eisenberg found that the use of herb remedies in-
creased in 380% and the use of high doses of vita-
mins rose 130% in a period of time of 7 years.
Americans now spend around $27 billion dollars a
year on this kind of therapies. Even some insur-
ance companies pay for the alternative medicine
treatments (“Trends in Alternative Medicine use
in the United States,”1990-1997, JAMA,
1998;280:156-1575).
More attention was addressed to alterna-
tive medicine in 1998 when the whole issue of
JAMA published on November 11
th
, was almost
dedicated to the topic of alternative medicine.
A study done by the Office of Education
Development, Harvard University, School of Medi-
cine showed that 75 of the 125 schools of Medi-
cine in the United States offer elective courses on
alternative medicine. Thirty-eight courses of the
123 elective courses are offered by the Departments
of Family Medicine and 14 courses are offered by
the Departments of Internal Medicine (“Courses
involving complementary and alternative medicine
at US medical schools,” JAMA 1998;(9)280:784-
787, Wetzel MS, Eisenberg DM).
There is an advertisement that says: “Can-
cer Treatment Centers is the only group of hospi-
tals in the country in which, the doctors of naturo-
pathic medicine work side by side with the
oncologists as an integral part of their treatment
team against cancer”. This statement would be in-
credible a few years ago.
Now I will attempt to present a clear pic-
ture of biofeedback research.
The term feedback is defined as a method
of controlling a system by reinserting into it the
results of its past performance. We can learn to
control our performance in sport by observing and
acting upon the results of our previous results.
So biofeedback is simply a special kind of
feedback. In this case, it can be the feedback of
different parts of the body. It can be the brain, the
heart, the muscles and so on. Then we got biofeed-
back training, which is the procedure that allows
us to tune into our body functions and eventually
to control them. It is really fascinating.
In a typical biofeedback training session an
individual can “see” his heartbeat and “hear” his
brain waves. That means that he has the informa-
tion he needs to start to control them.
Once a subject is able to recognize his brain