Medical data is for informational purposes only. You should always consult your family physician, or one of our referral physicians prior to treatment.
1
Roger Wyburn-Mason
Joan Wyburn-Mason
Professor Roger Wyburn-Mason was curing folks
of so-called incurable rheumatoid disease (including
rheumatoid arthritis) way back in the 1960s. Folks in
England, Australia, Canada, United States and on other
continents would hear of his success from those cured.
They’d contact him and he’d tell them how do achieve
this wonderful result!
As you will see from the following mini-biography
Roger was a brilliant scholar, researcher and world-
famed nerve specialist until he publicly touted his suc-
cesses when treating this crippling disease. Then he
was suddenly ostracized by the know-it-all medical pro-
fession, according to his wife, Joan, in her Dedication,
Love and Humor: My Life With Professor Roger
Wyburn-Mason. [http://www.arthritistrust.org]
Although he resisted the idea that the Amoeba
chromatosa was the sole cause of Rheumatoid Dis-
ease by a friend and world-renowned protozoologist,
Vice Admiral Stamm, Professor Wyburn-Mason did fi-
nally accept the idea. While no one has yet been able
to reproduce their laboratory findings, at least the treat-
ment based upon their hypothesis works, curing folks
worldwide when nothing else is [or was] available.
In fact, nothing else is available worldwide to this
day, except the treatment that this foundation derived
from Roger Wyburn-Mason’s perhaps faulty hypoth-
esis plus the treatment based on the work of Thomas
McPherson Brown, M.D., claiming that a mycoplasm
is the primary culprit.
To Dr. Wyburn-Mason’s credit, he rescinded his be-
lief that the Amoeba chromatosa was the essential cause
of rheumatoid diseases. His assertions and objections
to their review were reported in in the April 24, 1979
Lancet, as follows:
“Sir,
“Referring to your nine line review in your
issue of April 7th. 1979 of my 479 page
monograph The Causation of Rheumatoid
Disease and Many Human Cancers. A
New Concept in Medicine, 1978, I would
like to draw your attention to the fact that
the term “Amoeba chromatosa” to which
you refer was used in a previous book by
me published in 1964, but that in the mono-
graph that you were supposed to be re-
viewing further work over 14 years de-
scribed in this has shown that the organ-
ism is probably one or more species of
Naegleria, and the term Amoeba
chromatosa abandoned, but you fail to
mention this. Your statement that my ideas
should be refuted or confirmed is welcome,
but if the monograph had been carefully
read full details of the properties of the or-
ganism had also the names of the workers
and establishments where the isolation of
this organism has been confirmed would
have been found. In a leading article in your
own journal (1) on “Pathogenic free-living
amoebae” you state “the discovery that
free-living protozoa (including amoebae)
are able to infect man and animals has revo-
lutionized the very concept of parasitism”.
Why then should you be surprised at my
discovery of an amoeba in the tissues? You
also refer to the findings of Cursons et al.
(2) using a direct fluorescent amoebic an-
tibody test on the sera of 200 people in New
Zealand, including new-born children, who
found fluorescence in all, either with neat
serum or with serum diluted up to 1/20 of
Naegleria and 1/80 of Acanthamoebae, sug-
gesting that all humans are or have been
infected with one or more of these organ-
isms, the new-born through the placenta.
In Memoriam
Roger Wyburn-Mason, M.D., Ph.D.
October 2, 1911-June 16, 1983
By Anthony di Fabio, June 18, 1983